On Oct 9, 8:12 pm, Sebastian Karlsson
wrote:
> Basically, this little string right here, could be extremely helpful
> if it was portable. Couldn't the standard committee just come up with
> a simple scheme for this? namespace::classname? I'm writing a
> serialization lib and it's damn hard to make it portable without it.
> Does anyone know why it never got to be in the standard?
I don't know, but what do you do about anonymous namespaces?
--
[ See http://www.gotw.ca/resources/clcm.htm for info about ]
[ comp.lang.c++.moderated. First time posters: Do this! ]
Why the decision to leave typeinfo::name() out of the standard?
